1961 Abarth 2200 vs. 1947 Jeep CJ2A
To start off, 1961 Abarth 2200 is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1947 Jeep CJ2A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1947 Jeep CJ2A would be higher. At 2,199 cc (4 cylinders), 1947 Jeep CJ2A is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1961 Abarth 2200 (133 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 74 more horse power than 1947 Jeep CJ2A. (59 HP @ 3600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1961 Abarth 2200 should accelerate faster than 1947 Jeep CJ2A. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1947 Jeep CJ2A weights approximately 10 kg more than 1961 Abarth 2200.
Because 1947 Jeep CJ2A is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1961 Abarth 2200. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1947 Jeep CJ2A will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1961 Abarth 2200 | 1947 Jeep CJ2A | |
| Make | Abarth | Jeep |
| Model | 2200 | CJ2A |
| Year Released | 1961 | 1947 |
| Body Type | Convertible | SUV |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2160 cc | 2199 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 133 HP | 59 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 3600 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1100 kg | 1110 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4590 mm | 3130 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1460 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1630 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2460 mm | 2040 mm |
