1961 Abarth 2200 vs. 1951 Austin A 40
To start off, 1961 Abarth 2200 is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Austin A 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Austin A 40 would be higher. At 2,160 cc (6 cylinders), 1961 Abarth 2200 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1961 Abarth 2200 (133 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 95 more horse power than 1951 Austin A 40. (38 HP @ 4300 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1961 Abarth 2200 should accelerate faster than 1951 Austin A 40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1961 Abarth 2200 weights approximately 130 kg more than 1951 Austin A 40. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1961 Abarth 2200 | 1951 Austin A 40 | |
Make | Abarth | Austin |
Model | 2200 | A 40 |
Year Released | 1961 | 1951 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2160 cc | 1200 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 133 HP | 38 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4300 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1100 kg | 970 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4590 mm | 3890 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1560 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1620 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2460 mm | 2360 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 27 L | 48 L |