1961 Abarth 2200 vs. 1953 Hudson Super Wasp
To start off, 1961 Abarth 2200 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Hudson Super Wasp. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Hudson Super Wasp would be higher. At 4,293 cc (6 cylinders), 1953 Hudson Super Wasp is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1953 Hudson Super Wasp (140 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 7 more horse power than 1961 Abarth 2200. (133 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1953 Hudson Super Wasp should accelerate faster than 1961 Abarth 2200. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1953 Hudson Super Wasp weights approximately 499 kg more than 1961 Abarth 2200. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1961 Abarth 2200 | 1953 Hudson Super Wasp | |
| Make | Abarth | Hudson |
| Model | 2200 | Super Wasp |
| Year Released | 1961 | 1953 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2160 cc | 4293 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 133 HP | 140 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1100 kg | 1599 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4590 mm | 5160 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1980 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1530 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2460 mm | 3030 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 27 L | 75 L |
