1961 Abarth 2200 vs. 1965 Cadillac DeVille
To start off, 1965 Cadillac DeVille is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Abarth 2200. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Abarth 2200 would be higher. At 7,027 cc (8 cylinders), 1965 Cadillac DeVille is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1965 Cadillac DeVille (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 75 more horse power than 1961 Abarth 2200. (133 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1965 Cadillac DeVille should accelerate faster than 1961 Abarth 2200. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1965 Cadillac DeVille weights approximately 930 kg more than 1961 Abarth 2200. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1961 Abarth 2200 | 1965 Cadillac DeVille | |
Make | Abarth | Cadillac |
Model | 2200 | DeVille |
Year Released | 1961 | 1965 |
Body Type | Convertible | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2160 cc | 7027 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 133 HP | 208 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1100 kg | 2030 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4590 mm | 5700 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 2030 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1370 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2460 mm | 3300 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 27 L | 95 L |