1961 Abarth 2200 vs. 1968 Cadillac DeVille
To start off, 1968 Cadillac DeVille is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Abarth 2200. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Abarth 2200 would be higher. At 7,732 cc (8 cylinders), 1968 Cadillac DeVille is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1968 Cadillac DeVille (228 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 95 more horse power than 1961 Abarth 2200. (133 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1968 Cadillac DeVille should accelerate faster than 1961 Abarth 2200. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1968 Cadillac DeVille weights approximately 1005 kg more than 1961 Abarth 2200. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1961 Abarth 2200 | 1968 Cadillac DeVille | |
Make | Abarth | Cadillac |
Model | 2200 | DeVille |
Year Released | 1961 | 1968 |
Body Type | Convertible | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2160 cc | 7732 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 133 HP | 228 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1100 kg | 2105 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4590 mm | 5720 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 2040 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1390 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2460 mm | 3300 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 27 L | 82 L |