1961 Abarth 2200 vs. 1997 Jeep Cherokee
To start off, 1997 Jeep Cherokee is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Abarth 2200. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Abarth 2200 would be higher. At 2,463 cc (4 cylinders), 1997 Jeep Cherokee is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1961 Abarth 2200 (133 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 13 more horse power than 1997 Jeep Cherokee. (120 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1961 Abarth 2200 should accelerate faster than 1997 Jeep Cherokee. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1997 Jeep Cherokee weights approximately 280 kg more than 1961 Abarth 2200.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1961 Abarth 2200 | 1997 Jeep Cherokee | |
Make | Abarth | Jeep |
Model | 2200 | Cherokee |
Year Released | 1961 | 1997 |
Body Type | Convertible | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2160 cc | 2463 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 133 HP | 120 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1100 kg | 1380 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4590 mm | 4260 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1730 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1640 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2460 mm | 2580 mm |