1961 Abarth 2200 vs. 1998 Audi AD
To start off, 1998 Audi AD is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Abarth 2200. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Abarth 2200 would be higher. At 3,001 cc, 1998 Audi AD is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1961 Abarth 2200 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1961 Abarth 2200. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Audi AD, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1961 Abarth 2200 | 1998 Audi AD | |
| Make | Abarth | Audi |
| Model | 2200 | AD |
| Year Released | 1961 | 1998 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2160 cc | 3001 cc |
| Engine Type | in-line | electric |
| Horse Power | 133 HP | 0 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
