1961 Abarth 2200 vs. 1998 Renault Clio

To start off, 1998 Renault Clio is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Abarth 2200. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Abarth 2200 would be higher. At 2,160 cc (6 cylinders), 1961 Abarth 2200 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1961 Abarth 2200 (133 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 54 more horse power than 1998 Renault Clio. (79 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1961 Abarth 2200 should accelerate faster than 1998 Renault Clio. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1961 Abarth 2200 weights approximately 230 kg more than 1998 Renault Clio. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1961 Abarth 2200 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1961 Abarth 2200. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1998 Renault Clio, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.

Compare all specifications:

1961 Abarth 2200 1998 Renault Clio
Make Abarth Renault
Model 2200 Clio
Year Released 1961 1998
Body Type Convertible Hatchback
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2160 cc 1388 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 133 HP 79 HP
Engine RPM 6000 RPM 6000 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Front
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Doors 2 doors 3 doors
Vehicle Weight 1100 kg 870 kg
Vehicle Length 4590 mm 3780 mm
Vehicle Width 1630 mm 1650 mm
Vehicle Height 1340 mm 1430 mm
Wheelbase Size 2460 mm 2480 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 27 L 50 L