1961 Abarth 2200 vs. 2000 Ford Artic
To start off, 2000 Ford Artic is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Abarth 2200. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Abarth 2200 would be higher. At 3,998 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Ford Artic is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1961 Abarth 2200 (133 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 5 more horse power than 2000 Ford Artic. (128 HP @ 6250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1961 Abarth 2200 should accelerate faster than 2000 Ford Artic. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Ford Artic weights approximately 198 kg more than 1961 Abarth 2200.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2000 Ford Artic has automatic transmission and 1961 Abarth 2200 has manual transmission. 1961 Abarth 2200 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2000 Ford Artic will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1961 Abarth 2200 | 2000 Ford Artic | |
Make | Abarth | Ford |
Model | 2200 | Artic |
Year Released | 1961 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2160 cc | 3998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 133 HP | 128 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 6250 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Vehicle Weight | 1100 kg | 1298 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4590 mm | 5240 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1830 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1790 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2460 mm | 3200 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 27 L | 68 L |