1961 Abarth 2200 vs. 2002 Ford GT 40
To start off, 2002 Ford GT 40 is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Abarth 2200. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Abarth 2200 would be higher. At 4,195 cc (8 cylinders), 2002 Ford GT 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Ford GT 40 (350 HP @ 7200 RPM) has 217 more horse power than 1961 Abarth 2200. (133 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Ford GT 40 should accelerate faster than 1961 Abarth 2200. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Ford GT 40 weights approximately 420 kg more than 1961 Abarth 2200. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1961 Abarth 2200 | 2002 Ford GT 40 | |
| Make | Abarth | Ford |
| Model | 2200 | GT 40 |
| Year Released | 1961 | 2002 |
| Body Type | Convertible | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Middle |
| Engine Size | 2160 cc | 4195 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 133 HP | 350 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 7200 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1100 kg | 1520 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4590 mm | 4620 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1960 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1110 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2460 mm | 2620 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 27 L | 107 L |
