1961 Abarth 2200 vs. 2003 Smart Roadster
To start off, 2003 Smart Roadster is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Abarth 2200. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Abarth 2200 would be higher. At 2,160 cc (6 cylinders), 1961 Abarth 2200 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1961 Abarth 2200 (133 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 33 more horse power than 2003 Smart Roadster. (100 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1961 Abarth 2200 should accelerate faster than 2003 Smart Roadster.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1961 Abarth 2200 | 2003 Smart Roadster | |
Make | Abarth | Smart |
Model | 2200 | Roadster |
Year Released | 1961 | 2003 |
Body Type | Convertible | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 2160 cc | 698 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 133 HP | 100 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4590 mm | 3430 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1620 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1200 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2460 mm | 2370 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 27 L | 35 L |