1961 Abarth 2200 vs. 2003 SsangYong Korando
To start off, 2003 SsangYong Korando is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Abarth 2200. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Abarth 2200 would be higher. At 2,295 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 SsangYong Korando is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 SsangYong Korando (138 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 5 more horse power than 1961 Abarth 2200. (133 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 SsangYong Korando should accelerate faster than 1961 Abarth 2200.
Because 2003 SsangYong Korando is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1961 Abarth 2200. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 SsangYong Korando will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1961 Abarth 2200 | 2003 SsangYong Korando | |
Make | Abarth | SsangYong |
Model | 2200 | Korando |
Year Released | 1961 | 2003 |
Body Type | Convertible | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2160 cc | 2295 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 133 HP | 138 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4590 mm | 4340 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1850 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1850 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2460 mm | 2490 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 27 L | 70 L |