1961 Abarth 2200 vs. 2004 Chevrolet Astro
To start off, 2004 Chevrolet Astro is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Abarth 2200. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Abarth 2200 would be higher. At 4,294 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Chevrolet Astro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Chevrolet Astro (187 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 54 more horse power than 1961 Abarth 2200. (133 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Chevrolet Astro should accelerate faster than 1961 Abarth 2200. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Chevrolet Astro weights approximately 850 kg more than 1961 Abarth 2200. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1961 Abarth 2200 | 2004 Chevrolet Astro | |
| Make | Abarth | Chevrolet |
| Model | 2200 | Astro |
| Year Released | 1961 | 2004 |
| Body Type | Convertible | Minivan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2160 cc | 4294 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 133 HP | 187 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1100 kg | 1950 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4590 mm | 4830 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1980 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1910 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2460 mm | 2830 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 27 L | 117 L |
