1961 Abarth 2200 vs. 2004 Ford Econovan
To start off, 2004 Ford Econovan is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Abarth 2200. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Abarth 2200 would be higher. At 2,160 cc (6 cylinders), 1961 Abarth 2200 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1961 Abarth 2200 (133 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 43 more horse power than 2004 Ford Econovan. (90 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1961 Abarth 2200 should accelerate faster than 2004 Ford Econovan. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Ford Econovan weights approximately 196 kg more than 1961 Abarth 2200.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1961 Abarth 2200 | 2004 Ford Econovan | |
Make | Abarth | Ford |
Model | 2200 | Econovan |
Year Released | 1961 | 2004 |
Body Type | Convertible | Van |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2160 cc | 1789 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 133 HP | 90 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1100 kg | 1296 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4590 mm | 4290 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1640 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1870 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2460 mm | 2210 mm |