1961 Abarth 2200 vs. 2005 Bugatti Chiron

To start off, 2005 Bugatti Chiron is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Abarth 2200. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Abarth 2200 would be higher. At 6,255 cc (18 cylinders), 2005 Bugatti Chiron is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Bugatti Chiron (547 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 414 more horse power than 1961 Abarth 2200. (133 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Bugatti Chiron should accelerate faster than 1961 Abarth 2200.

Because 2005 Bugatti Chiron is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1961 Abarth 2200. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Bugatti Chiron will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.

Compare all specifications:

1961 Abarth 2200 2005 Bugatti Chiron
Make Abarth Bugatti
Model 2200 Chiron
Year Released 1961 2005
Body Type Convertible Coupe
Engine Position Front Rear
Engine Size 2160 cc 6255 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 18 cylinders
Engine Type in-line W
Horse Power 133 HP 547 HP
Engine RPM 6000 RPM 4800 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear 4WD
Number of Doors 2 doors 2 doors
Vehicle Length 4590 mm 4430 mm
Vehicle Width 1630 mm 2010 mm
Vehicle Height 1340 mm 1160 mm


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]