1961 Abarth 2200 vs. 2005 Ford FPV BF GT
To start off, 2005 Ford FPV BF GT is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Abarth 2200. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Abarth 2200 would be higher. At 5,407 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Ford FPV BF GT is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Ford FPV BF GT (389 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 256 more horse power than 1961 Abarth 2200. (133 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Ford FPV BF GT should accelerate faster than 1961 Abarth 2200. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Ford FPV BF GT weights approximately 755 kg more than 1961 Abarth 2200. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1961 Abarth 2200 | 2005 Ford FPV BF GT | |
Make | Abarth | Ford |
Model | 2200 | FPV BF GT |
Year Released | 1961 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2160 cc | 5407 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 133 HP | 389 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1100 kg | 1855 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4590 mm | 4950 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 2150 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2460 mm | 2840 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 27 L | 68 L |