1961 Abarth 2200 vs. 2009 Ford E-250
To start off, 2009 Ford E-250 is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Abarth 2200. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Abarth 2200 would be higher. At 4,606 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Ford E-250 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Ford E-250 (225 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 92 more horse power than 1961 Abarth 2200. (133 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Ford E-250 should accelerate faster than 1961 Abarth 2200. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1961 Abarth 2200 weights approximately 134 kg more than 2009 Ford E-250.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2009 Ford E-250 has automatic transmission and 1961 Abarth 2200 has manual transmission. 1961 Abarth 2200 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Ford E-250 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1961 Abarth 2200 | 2009 Ford E-250 | |
Make | Abarth | Ford |
Model | 2200 | E-250 |
Year Released | 1961 | 2009 |
Body Type | Convertible | Van |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2160 cc | 4606 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 133 HP | 225 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1100 kg | 966 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4590 mm | 5520 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 2020 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 2120 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2460 mm | 3510 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 27 L | 132 L |