1961 Abarth 2200 vs. 2009 Renault Megane
To start off, 2009 Renault Megane is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Abarth 2200. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Abarth 2200 would be higher. At 2,160 cc (6 cylinders), 1961 Abarth 2200 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Renault Megane (221 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 88 more horse power than 1961 Abarth 2200. (133 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Renault Megane should accelerate faster than 1961 Abarth 2200.
Because 1961 Abarth 2200 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1961 Abarth 2200. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Renault Megane, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1961 Abarth 2200 | 2009 Renault Megane | |
Make | Abarth | Renault |
Model | 2200 | Megane |
Year Released | 1961 | 2009 |
Body Type | Convertible | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2160 cc | 1997 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 133 HP | 221 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4590 mm | 4230 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 2030 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2460 mm | 2630 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 27 L | 60 L |