1961 Abarth 2200 vs. 2010 BMW M3
To start off, 2010 BMW M3 is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Abarth 2200. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Abarth 2200 would be higher. At 4,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2010 BMW M3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 BMW M3 (414 HP @ 8300 RPM) has 281 more horse power than 1961 Abarth 2200. (133 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 BMW M3 should accelerate faster than 1961 Abarth 2200. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 BMW M3 weights approximately 780 kg more than 1961 Abarth 2200. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1961 Abarth 2200 | 2010 BMW M3 | |
| Make | Abarth | BMW |
| Model | 2200 | M3 |
| Year Released | 1961 | 2010 |
| Body Type | Convertible | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2160 cc | 4000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 133 HP | 414 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 8300 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1100 kg | 1880 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4590 mm | 4615 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1803 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1392 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2460 mm | 2761 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 27 L | 63 L |
