1961 Abarth 2200 vs. 2012 Audi A6
To start off, 2012 Audi A6 is newer by 51 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Abarth 2200. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Abarth 2200 would be higher. At 2,160 cc (6 cylinders), 1961 Abarth 2200 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Audi A6 (168 HP @ 4200 RPM) has 35 more horse power than 1961 Abarth 2200. (133 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Audi A6 should accelerate faster than 1961 Abarth 2200.
Because 1961 Abarth 2200 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1961 Abarth 2200. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Audi A6, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1961 Abarth 2200 | 2012 Audi A6 | |
Make | Abarth | Audi |
Model | 2200 | A6 |
Year Released | 1961 | 2012 |
Body Type | Convertible | Station Wagon |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2160 cc | 1968 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 133 HP | 168 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4590 mm | 4915 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1872 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1340 mm | 1453 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2460 mm | 2911 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 27 L | 75 L |