1961 Abarth 2400 vs. 1951 Allard K2
To start off, 1961 Abarth 2400 is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1951 Allard K2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1951 Allard K2 would be higher. At 3,622 cc (8 cylinders), 1951 Allard K2 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1961 Abarth 2400 (142 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 57 more horse power than 1951 Allard K2. (85 HP @ 3600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1961 Abarth 2400 should accelerate faster than 1951 Allard K2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1951 Allard K2 weights approximately 139 kg more than 1961 Abarth 2400.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1961 Abarth 2400 | 1951 Allard K2 | |
Make | Abarth | Allard |
Model | 2400 | K2 |
Year Released | 1961 | 1951 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2323 cc | 3622 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 142 HP | 85 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 3 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1056 kg | 1195 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4640 mm | 4270 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1320 mm | 1580 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2460 mm | 2700 mm |