1961 Abarth 2400 vs. 1952 Hudson Hornet
To start off, 1961 Abarth 2400 is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Hudson Hornet. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Hudson Hornet would be higher. At 4,810 cc (6 cylinders), 1952 Hudson Hornet is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1952 Hudson Hornet (144 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 3 more horse power than 1961 Abarth 2400. (141 HP @ 5800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1952 Hudson Hornet should accelerate faster than 1961 Abarth 2400. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Hudson Hornet weights approximately 710 kg more than 1961 Abarth 2400. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1961 Abarth 2400 | 1952 Hudson Hornet | |
| Make | Abarth | Hudson |
| Model | 2400 | Hornet |
| Year Released | 1961 | 1952 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2321 cc | 4810 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 141 HP | 144 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 3800 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1090 kg | 1800 kg |
| Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1980 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2460 mm | 2990 mm |
