1961 Abarth 600 vs. 1952 Austin A 40
To start off, 1961 Abarth 600 is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Austin A 40. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Austin A 40 would be higher. At 1,199 cc (4 cylinders), 1952 Austin A 40 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1961 Abarth 600 (47 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 6 more horse power than 1952 Austin A 40. (41 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1961 Abarth 600 should accelerate faster than 1952 Austin A 40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1952 Austin A 40 weights approximately 405 kg more than 1961 Abarth 600.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1952 Austin A 40 (79 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 13 more torque (in Nm) than 1961 Abarth 600. (66 Nm @ 2600 RPM). This means 1952 Austin A 40 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1961 Abarth 600.
Compare all specifications:
1961 Abarth 600 | 1952 Austin A 40 | |
Make | Abarth | Austin |
Model | 600 | A 40 |
Year Released | 1961 | 1952 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 847 cc | 1199 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 47 HP | 41 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Torque | 66 Nm | 79 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2600 RPM | 2400 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 7.2:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 595 kg | 1000 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3300 mm | 4060 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1390 mm | 1610 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1590 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 2360 mm |