1961 Abarth 700 vs. 1998 Abarth Monotipo

To start off, 1998 Abarth Monotipo is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Abarth 700. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Abarth 700 would be higher. At 1,996 cc (4 cylinders), 1998 Abarth Monotipo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Abarth Monotipo (330 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 285 more horse power than 1961 Abarth 700. (45 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1998 Abarth Monotipo should accelerate faster than 1961 Abarth 700. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1998 Abarth Monotipo weights approximately 310 kg more than 1961 Abarth 700. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Compare all specifications:

1961 Abarth 700 1998 Abarth Monotipo
Make Abarth Abarth
Model 700 Monotipo
Year Released 1961 1998
Engine Position Rear Front
Engine Size 745 cc 1996 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 45 HP 330 HP
Engine RPM 6000 RPM 6500 RPM
Engine Bore Size 62.5 mm 84 mm
Engine Stroke Size 64 mm 90 mm
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 2 seats 2 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 2 doors
Vehicle Weight 570 kg 880 kg
Vehicle Length 3600 mm 4460 mm
Vehicle Width 1400 mm 1890 mm
Vehicle Height 1180 mm 1210 mm
Wheelbase Size 2010 mm 2300 mm


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]