1961 Abarth Coupe vs. 2000 Seat Arosa
To start off, 2000 Seat Arosa is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Abarth Coupe. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Abarth Coupe would be higher. At 1,359 cc (4 cylinders), 2000 Seat Arosa is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Seat Arosa weights approximately 699 kg more than 1961 Abarth Coupe.
Because 1961 Abarth Coupe is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1961 Abarth Coupe. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Seat Arosa, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1961 Abarth Coupe | 2000 Seat Arosa | |
| Make | Abarth | Seat |
| Model | Coupe | Arosa |
| Year Released | 1961 | 2000 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 747 cc | 1359 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 0 HP | 123 HP |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 590 kg | 1289 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 2850 mm |
