1961 Abarth Coupe vs. 2013 Cadillac ATS
To start off, 2013 Cadillac ATS is newer by 52 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Abarth Coupe. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Abarth Coupe would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Cadillac ATS is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Cadillac ATS weights approximately 980 kg more than 1961 Abarth Coupe.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2013 Cadillac ATS has automatic transmission and 1961 Abarth Coupe has manual transmission. 1961 Abarth Coupe will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2013 Cadillac ATS will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1961 Abarth Coupe | 2013 Cadillac ATS | |
Make | Abarth | Cadillac |
Model | Coupe | ATS |
Year Released | 1961 | 2013 |
Body Type | Coupe | Sedan |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 747 cc | 3600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 317 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Flex Fuel |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed automatic |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 590 kg | 1570 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3490 mm | 4643 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1350 mm | 1806 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1200 mm | 1417 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 2776 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 61 L |