1961 Abarth Coupe vs. 2013 Smart Fortwo
To start off, 2013 Smart Fortwo is newer by 52 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Abarth Coupe. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Abarth Coupe would be higher. At 1,000 cc (3 cylinders), 2013 Smart Fortwo is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Smart Fortwo weights approximately 250 kg more than 1961 Abarth Coupe.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2013 Smart Fortwo has automatic transmission and 1961 Abarth Coupe has manual transmission. 1961 Abarth Coupe will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2013 Smart Fortwo will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1961 Abarth Coupe | 2013 Smart Fortwo | |
Make | Abarth | Smart |
Model | Coupe | Fortwo |
Year Released | 1961 | 2013 |
Body Type | Coupe | Convertible |
Engine Position | Rear | Rear |
Engine Size | 747 cc | 1000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 0 HP | 71 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | 5-speed automatic |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 590 kg | 840 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3490 mm | 2695 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1350 mm | 1559 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1200 mm | 1542 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 1867 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 55 L | 33 L |