1961 Abarth Monomille vs. 1982 Chevrolet Camaro
To start off, 1982 Chevrolet Camaro is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Abarth Monomille. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Abarth Monomille would be higher. At 2,474 cc (6 cylinders), 1982 Chevrolet Camaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1982 Chevrolet Camaro (89 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 30 more horse power than 1961 Abarth Monomille. (59 HP @ 6600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1982 Chevrolet Camaro should accelerate faster than 1961 Abarth Monomille.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1982 Chevrolet Camaro (179 Nm @ 2800 RPM) has 89 more torque (in Nm) than 1961 Abarth Monomille. (90 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 1982 Chevrolet Camaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1961 Abarth Monomille.
Compare all specifications:
1961 Abarth Monomille | 1982 Chevrolet Camaro | |
Make | Abarth | Chevrolet |
Model | Monomille | Camaro |
Year Released | 1961 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 982 cc | 2474 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 89 HP |
Engine RPM | 6600 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 90 Nm | 179 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 2800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3490 mm | 4880 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1420 mm | 1860 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 2580 mm |