1961 Abarth Monomille vs. 1999 Alfa Romeo Bella
To start off, 1999 Alfa Romeo Bella is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Abarth Monomille. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Abarth Monomille would be higher. At 2,959 cc (6 cylinders), 1999 Alfa Romeo Bella is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Alfa Romeo Bella (223 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 164 more horse power than 1961 Abarth Monomille. (59 HP @ 6600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1999 Alfa Romeo Bella should accelerate faster than 1961 Abarth Monomille.
Because 1961 Abarth Monomille is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1961 Abarth Monomille. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Alfa Romeo Bella, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Alfa Romeo Bella (282 Nm @ 5000 RPM) has 192 more torque (in Nm) than 1961 Abarth Monomille. (90 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 1999 Alfa Romeo Bella will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1961 Abarth Monomille.
Compare all specifications:
1961 Abarth Monomille | 1999 Alfa Romeo Bella | |
Make | Abarth | Alfa Romeo |
Model | Monomille | Bella |
Year Released | 1961 | 1999 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 982 cc | 2959 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 223 HP |
Engine RPM | 6600 RPM | 6200 RPM |
Torque | 90 Nm | 282 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Length | 3490 mm | 4460 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1420 mm | 1910 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1180 mm | 1320 mm |