1961 Abarth Monomille vs. 2002 Mazda Laputa
To start off, 2002 Mazda Laputa is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Abarth Monomille. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Abarth Monomille would be higher. At 982 cc (4 cylinders), 1961 Abarth Monomille is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1961 Abarth Monomille (59 HP @ 6600 RPM) has 7 more horse power than 2002 Mazda Laputa. (52 HP @ 6500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1961 Abarth Monomille should accelerate faster than 2002 Mazda Laputa. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Mazda Laputa weights approximately 190 kg more than 1961 Abarth Monomille.
Because 1961 Abarth Monomille is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1961 Abarth Monomille. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Mazda Laputa, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1961 Abarth Monomille (90 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 27 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Mazda Laputa. (63 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1961 Abarth Monomille will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Mazda Laputa.
Compare all specifications:
1961 Abarth Monomille | 2002 Mazda Laputa | |
Make | Abarth | Mazda |
Model | Monomille | Laputa |
Year Released | 1961 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 982 cc | 657 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 52 HP |
Engine RPM | 6600 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Torque | 90 Nm | 63 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 65 mm | 68 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 74 mm | 60.4 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.8:1 | 10.5:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 560 kg | 750 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3490 mm | 3400 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1420 mm | 1480 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1180 mm | 1550 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 2370 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 59 L | 30 L |