1961 Abarth Monomille vs. 2003 Daewoo Rezzo

To start off, 2003 Daewoo Rezzo is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Abarth Monomille. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Abarth Monomille would be higher. At 1,599 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Daewoo Rezzo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Daewoo Rezzo (107 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 48 more horse power than 1961 Abarth Monomille. (59 HP @ 6600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Daewoo Rezzo should accelerate faster than 1961 Abarth Monomille. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Daewoo Rezzo weights approximately 710 kg more than 1961 Abarth Monomille. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1961 Abarth Monomille is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1961 Abarth Monomille. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Daewoo Rezzo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Daewoo Rezzo (144 Nm @ 3400 RPM) has 54 more torque (in Nm) than 1961 Abarth Monomille. (90 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2003 Daewoo Rezzo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1961 Abarth Monomille.

Compare all specifications:

1961 Abarth Monomille 2003 Daewoo Rezzo
Make Abarth Daewoo
Model Monomille Rezzo
Year Released 1961 2003
Engine Position Rear Front
Engine Size 982 cc 1599 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 59 HP 107 HP
Engine RPM 6600 RPM 5200 RPM
Torque 90 Nm 144 Nm
Torque RPM 3200 RPM 3400 RPM
Engine Bore Size 65 mm 79 mm
Engine Stroke Size 74 mm 81.5 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 9.8:1 9.0:1
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Front
Number of Seats 2 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Weight 560 kg 1270 kg
Vehicle Length 3490 mm 4360 mm
Vehicle Width 1420 mm 1760 mm
Vehicle Height 1180 mm 1590 mm
Wheelbase Size 2010 mm 2610 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 59 L 60 L