1961 Abarth Monomille vs. 2003 Ford Ecosport
To start off, 2003 Ford Ecosport is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Abarth Monomille. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Abarth Monomille would be higher. At 2,000 cc (4 cylinders), 2003 Ford Ecosport is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Ford Ecosport (143 HP) has 84 more horse power than 1961 Abarth Monomille. (59 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Ford Ecosport should accelerate faster than 1961 Abarth Monomille.
Because 2003 Ford Ecosport is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1961 Abarth Monomille. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Ford Ecosport will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1961 Abarth Monomille | 2003 Ford Ecosport | |
| Make | Abarth | Ford |
| Model | Monomille | Ecosport |
| Year Released | 1961 | 2003 |
| Engine Position | Rear | Front |
| Engine Size | 982 cc | 2000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 59 HP | 143 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 3490 mm | 4228 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1420 mm | 1980 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1180 mm | 1679 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2010 mm | 2490 mm |
