1961 Abarth Monomille vs. 2010 Saturn Outlook
To start off, 2010 Saturn Outlook is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Abarth Monomille. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Abarth Monomille would be higher. At 3,564 cc (6 cylinders), 2010 Saturn Outlook is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Saturn Outlook (277 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 218 more horse power than 1961 Abarth Monomille. (59 HP @ 6600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Saturn Outlook should accelerate faster than 1961 Abarth Monomille.
Because 1961 Abarth Monomille is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1961 Abarth Monomille. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Saturn Outlook, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Saturn Outlook (253 Nm @ 5500 RPM) has 163 more torque (in Nm) than 1961 Abarth Monomille. (90 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2010 Saturn Outlook will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1961 Abarth Monomille.
Compare all specifications:
1961 Abarth Monomille | 2010 Saturn Outlook | |
Make | Abarth | Saturn |
Model | Monomille | Outlook |
Year Released | 1961 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Rear | Front |
Engine Size | 982 cc | 3564 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 277 HP |
Engine RPM | 6600 RPM | 6400 RPM |
Torque | 90 Nm | 253 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3200 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.8:1 | 11.4:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 8 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Width | 1420 mm | 1990 mm |