1961 AC Ace vs. 1972 Lancia 2000
To start off, 1972 Lancia 2000 is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 AC Ace. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 AC Ace would be higher. At 2,553 cc (6 cylinders), 1961 AC Ace is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1972 Lancia 2000 (116 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 16 more horse power than 1961 AC Ace. (100 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1972 Lancia 2000 should accelerate faster than 1961 AC Ace. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1972 Lancia 2000 weights approximately 422 kg more than 1961 AC Ace. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1961 AC Ace is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1961 AC Ace. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1972 Lancia 2000, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1961 AC Ace (180 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 10 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Lancia 2000. (170 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1961 AC Ace will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Lancia 2000.
Compare all specifications:
1961 AC Ace | 1972 Lancia 2000 | |
Make | AC | Lancia |
Model | Ace | 2000 |
Year Released | 1961 | 1972 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2553 cc | 1995 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 100 HP | 116 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 180 Nm | 170 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 82.6 mm | 84.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 79.5 mm | 90 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 7.8:1 | 8.9:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 813 kg | 1235 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 4630 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1620 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1250 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 2660 mm |