1961 AC Ace vs. 1992 Volvo 240
To start off, 1992 Volvo 240 is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 AC Ace. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 AC Ace would be higher. At 2,553 cc (6 cylinders), 1961 AC Ace is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1961 AC Ace (100 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 4 more horse power than 1992 Volvo 240. (96 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1961 AC Ace should accelerate faster than 1992 Volvo 240. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1992 Volvo 240 weights approximately 483 kg more than 1961 AC Ace.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1961 AC Ace (180 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 23 more torque (in Nm) than 1992 Volvo 240. (157 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 1961 AC Ace will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1992 Volvo 240.
Compare all specifications:
1961 AC Ace | 1992 Volvo 240 | |
Make | AC | Volvo |
Model | Ace | 240 |
Year Released | 1961 | 1992 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2553 cc | 1986 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 100 HP | 96 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5400 RPM |
Torque | 180 Nm | 157 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 3200 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 82.6 mm | 82.7 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 79.5 mm | 93 mm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 813 kg | 1296 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 4790 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1730 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1250 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 2660 mm |