1961 AC Ace vs. 2000 Holden HRT
To start off, 2000 Holden HRT is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 AC Ace. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 AC Ace would be higher. At 5,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Holden HRT is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1961 AC Ace is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1961 AC Ace. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Holden HRT, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Holden HRT (815 Nm) has 635 more torque (in Nm) than 1961 AC Ace. (180 Nm). This means 2000 Holden HRT will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1961 AC Ace.
Compare all specifications:
| 1961 AC Ace | 2000 Holden HRT | |
| Make | AC | Holden |
| Model | Ace | HRT |
| Year Released | 1961 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2553 cc | 5000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 100 HP | 0 HP |
| Torque | 180 Nm | 815 Nm |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
