1961 AC Ace vs. 2003 Ford C-MAX
To start off, 2003 Ford C-MAX is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 AC Ace. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 AC Ace would be higher. At 2,553 cc (6 cylinders), 1961 AC Ace is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Ford C-MAX (128 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 28 more horse power than 1961 AC Ace. (100 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Ford C-MAX should accelerate faster than 1961 AC Ace. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Ford C-MAX weights approximately 609 kg more than 1961 AC Ace. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1961 AC Ace is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1961 AC Ace. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Ford C-MAX, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1961 AC Ace (180 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 5 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Ford C-MAX. (175 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1961 AC Ace will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Ford C-MAX.
Compare all specifications:
1961 AC Ace | 2003 Ford C-MAX | |
Make | AC | Ford |
Model | Ace | C-MAX |
Year Released | 1961 | 2003 |
Body Type | Roadster | Minivan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2553 cc | 1753 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 100 HP | 128 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 180 Nm | 175 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 82.6 mm | 83 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 79.5 mm | 83.1 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 7.8:1 | 11.0:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 813 kg | 1422 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 4340 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1830 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1250 mm | 1600 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 2650 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 59 L |