1961 AC Ace vs. 2003 Ford Ecosport
To start off, 2003 Ford Ecosport is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 AC Ace. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 AC Ace would be higher. At 2,553 cc (6 cylinders), 1961 AC Ace is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1961 AC Ace (100 HP) has 33 more horse power than 2003 Ford Ecosport. (67 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1961 AC Ace should accelerate faster than 2003 Ford Ecosport.
Because 1961 AC Ace is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1961 AC Ace. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Ford Ecosport, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1961 AC Ace | 2003 Ford Ecosport | |
Make | AC | Ford |
Model | Ace | Ecosport |
Year Released | 1961 | 2003 |
Body Type | Roadster | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2553 cc | 1400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 100 HP | 67 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 4228 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1980 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1250 mm | 1679 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 2490 mm |