1961 AC Ace vs. 2003 MCC Smart
To start off, 2003 MCC Smart is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 AC Ace. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 AC Ace would be higher. At 2,553 cc (6 cylinders), 1961 AC Ace is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 MCC Smart (106 HP) has 6 more horse power than 1961 AC Ace. (100 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2003 MCC Smart should accelerate faster than 1961 AC Ace. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 MCC Smart weights approximately 162 kg more than 1961 AC Ace. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1961 AC Ace is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1961 AC Ace. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 MCC Smart, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1961 AC Ace (180 Nm) has 35 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 MCC Smart. (145 Nm). This means 1961 AC Ace will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 MCC Smart. 2003 MCC Smart has automatic transmission and 1961 AC Ace has manual transmission. 1961 AC Ace will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2003 MCC Smart will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1961 AC Ace | 2003 MCC Smart | |
Make | AC | MCC |
Model | Ace | Smart |
Year Released | 1961 | 2003 |
Body Type | Roadster | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2553 cc | 1499 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 100 HP | 106 HP |
Torque | 180 Nm | 145 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 82.6 mm | 75 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 79.5 mm | 84.8 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 7.8:1 | 10.5:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 813 kg | 975 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 3760 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1250 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 2510 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 47 L |