1961 AC Ace vs. 2004 Mitsubishi Outlander
To start off, 2004 Mitsubishi Outlander is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 AC Ace. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 AC Ace would be higher. At 2,553 cc (6 cylinders), 1961 AC Ace is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Mitsubishi Outlander (162 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 62 more horse power than 1961 AC Ace. (100 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Mitsubishi Outlander should accelerate faster than 1961 AC Ace. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Mitsubishi Outlander weights approximately 657 kg more than 1961 AC Ace. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Mitsubishi Outlander (215 Nm) has 35 more torque (in Nm) than 1961 AC Ace. (180 Nm). This means 2004 Mitsubishi Outlander will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1961 AC Ace.
Compare all specifications:
1961 AC Ace | 2004 Mitsubishi Outlander | |
Make | AC | Mitsubishi |
Model | Ace | Outlander |
Year Released | 1961 | 2004 |
Body Type | Roadster | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2553 cc | 2343 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 100 HP | 162 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 180 Nm | 215 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 82.6 mm | 87 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 79.5 mm | 100 mm |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 813 kg | 1470 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 4550 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1250 mm | 1690 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 2760 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 59 L |