1961 AC Ace vs. 2010 Peugeot 408
To start off, 2010 Peugeot 408 is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 AC Ace. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 AC Ace would be higher. At 2,553 cc (6 cylinders), 1961 AC Ace is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Peugeot 408 (110 HP @ 5750 RPM) has 10 more horse power than 1961 AC Ace. (100 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Peugeot 408 should accelerate faster than 1961 AC Ace.
Because 1961 AC Ace is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1961 AC Ace. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Peugeot 408, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1961 AC Ace (180 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 33 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Peugeot 408. (147 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1961 AC Ace will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Peugeot 408.
Compare all specifications:
1961 AC Ace | 2010 Peugeot 408 | |
Make | AC | Peugeot |
Model | Ace | 408 |
Year Released | 1961 | 2010 |
Body Type | Roadster | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2553 cc | 1587 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 100 HP | 110 HP |
Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5750 RPM |
Torque | 180 Nm | 147 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 4680 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1815 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1250 mm | 1525 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 2710 mm |