1961 AC Ace vs. 2013 Volkswagen Eos
To start off, 2013 Volkswagen Eos is newer by 52 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 AC Ace. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 AC Ace would be higher. At 2,553 cc (6 cylinders), 1961 AC Ace is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Volkswagen Eos (197 HP @ 5100 RPM) has 97 more horse power than 1961 AC Ace. (100 HP @ 5500 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Volkswagen Eos should accelerate faster than 1961 AC Ace. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Volkswagen Eos weights approximately 782 kg more than 1961 AC Ace. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1961 AC Ace is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1961 AC Ace. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Volkswagen Eos, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Volkswagen Eos (281 Nm @ 1700 RPM) has 101 more torque (in Nm) than 1961 AC Ace. (180 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 2013 Volkswagen Eos will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1961 AC Ace. 2013 Volkswagen Eos has automatic transmission and 1961 AC Ace has manual transmission. 1961 AC Ace will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2013 Volkswagen Eos will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1961 AC Ace | 2013 Volkswagen Eos | |
| Make | AC | Volkswagen |
| Model | Ace | Eos |
| Year Released | 1961 | 2013 |
| Body Type | Roadster | Convertible |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2553 cc | 2000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 100 HP | 197 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 5100 RPM |
| Torque | 180 Nm | 281 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 1700 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 82.6 mm | 82 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 79.5 mm | 92 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 7.8:1 | 9.6:1 |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed automatic |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 813 kg | 1595 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 4410 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1490 mm | 1791 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1250 mm | 1443 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 2578 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 55 L |
