1961 AC Aceca vs. 1984 Audi 4000
To start off, 1984 Audi 4000 is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 AC Aceca. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 AC Aceca would be higher. At 2,144 cc (5 cylinders), 1984 Audi 4000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1961 AC Aceca (125 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 25 more horse power than 1984 Audi 4000. (100 HP @ 4250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1961 AC Aceca should accelerate faster than 1984 Audi 4000.
Because 1984 Audi 4000 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1961 AC Aceca. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1984 Audi 4000 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1961 AC Aceca (167 Nm) has 30 more torque (in Nm) than 1984 Audi 4000. (137 Nm). This means 1961 AC Aceca will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1984 Audi 4000.
Compare all specifications:
| 1961 AC Aceca | 1984 Audi 4000 | |
| Make | AC | Audi |
| Model | Aceca | 4000 |
| Year Released | 1961 | 1984 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1971 cc | 2144 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 125 HP | 100 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4250 RPM |
| Torque | 167 Nm | 137 Nm |
| Engine Bore Size | 66 mm | 79.2 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 96 mm | 86.4 mm |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 4490 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1560 mm | 1690 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1370 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 2550 mm |
