1961 AC Aceca vs. 1992 Audi 80
To start off, 1992 Audi 80 is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 AC Aceca. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 AC Aceca would be higher. At 2,309 cc (5 cylinders), 1992 Audi 80 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1992 Audi 80 (132 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 7 more horse power than 1961 AC Aceca. (125 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1992 Audi 80 should accelerate faster than 1961 AC Aceca. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1992 Audi 80 weights approximately 476 kg more than 1961 AC Aceca. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1961 AC Aceca is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1961 AC Aceca. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1992 Audi 80, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1992 Audi 80 (190 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 23 more torque (in Nm) than 1961 AC Aceca. (167 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 1992 Audi 80 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1961 AC Aceca.
Compare all specifications:
1961 AC Aceca | 1992 Audi 80 | |
Make | AC | Audi |
Model | Aceca | 80 |
Year Released | 1961 | 1992 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1971 cc | 2309 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 125 HP | 132 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 167 Nm | 190 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4500 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 894 kg | 1370 kg |