1961 AC Aceca vs. 2000 Audi A8
To start off, 2000 Audi A8 is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 AC Aceca. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 AC Aceca would be higher. At 2,496 cc (6 cylinders), 2000 Audi A8 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1961 AC Aceca (125 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 36 more horse power than 2000 Audi A8. (89 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1961 AC Aceca should accelerate faster than 2000 Audi A8. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Audi A8 weights approximately 841 kg more than 1961 AC Aceca.
Because 2000 Audi A8 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1961 AC Aceca. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2000 Audi A8 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1961 AC Aceca | 2000 Audi A8 | |
Make | AC | Audi |
Model | Aceca | A8 |
Year Released | 1961 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1971 cc | 2496 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 125 HP | 89 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 66 mm | 78.3 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 96 mm | 86.4 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 894 kg | 1735 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 5040 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1560 mm | 1890 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1330 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 2890 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 59 L | 90 L |