1961 AC Cobra vs. 1982 Toyota Carina
To start off, 1982 Toyota Carina is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 AC Cobra. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 AC Cobra would be higher. At 4,265 cc (8 cylinders), 1961 AC Cobra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1961 AC Cobra (256 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 199 more horse power than 1982 Toyota Carina. (57 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1961 AC Cobra should accelerate faster than 1982 Toyota Carina. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1982 Toyota Carina weights approximately 120 kg more than 1961 AC Cobra.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1961 AC Cobra (365 Nm @ 4800 RPM) has 259 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Toyota Carina. (106 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1961 AC Cobra will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Toyota Carina.
Compare all specifications:
1961 AC Cobra | 1982 Toyota Carina | |
Make | AC | Toyota |
Model | Cobra | Carina |
Year Released | 1961 | 1982 |
Body Type | Roadster | Station Wagon |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4265 cc | 1839 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 256 HP | 57 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Torque | 365 Nm | 106 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4800 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 980 kg | 1100 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3850 mm | 4390 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1560 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1250 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 2510 mm |