1961 AC Cobra vs. 1999 Ford Econoline
To start off, 1999 Ford Econoline is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 AC Cobra. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 AC Cobra would be higher. At 5,407 cc (8 cylinders), 1999 Ford Econoline is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1961 AC Cobra (256 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 4 more horse power than 1999 Ford Econoline. (252 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1961 AC Cobra should accelerate faster than 1999 Ford Econoline. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Ford Econoline weights approximately 1405 kg more than 1961 AC Cobra.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Ford Econoline (474 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 109 more torque (in Nm) than 1961 AC Cobra. (365 Nm @ 4800 RPM). This means 1999 Ford Econoline will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1961 AC Cobra.
Compare all specifications:
1961 AC Cobra | 1999 Ford Econoline | |
Make | AC | Ford |
Model | Cobra | Econoline |
Year Released | 1961 | 1999 |
Body Type | Roadster | Van |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4265 cc | 5407 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 256 HP | 252 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Torque | 365 Nm | 474 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4800 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 980 kg | 2385 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3850 mm | 5390 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1560 mm | 2020 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1250 mm | 2060 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 3510 mm |