1961 AC Cobra vs. 2000 BMW 328
To start off, 2000 BMW 328 is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 AC Cobra. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 AC Cobra would be higher. At 4,265 cc (8 cylinders), 1961 AC Cobra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1961 AC Cobra (256 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 64 more horse power than 2000 BMW 328. (192 HP @ 7400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1961 AC Cobra should accelerate faster than 2000 BMW 328. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 BMW 328 weights approximately 608 kg more than 1961 AC Cobra.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1961 AC Cobra (365 Nm) has 86 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 BMW 328. (279 Nm). This means 1961 AC Cobra will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 BMW 328.
Compare all specifications:
1961 AC Cobra | 2000 BMW 328 | |
Make | AC | BMW |
Model | Cobra | 328 |
Year Released | 1961 | 2000 |
Body Type | Roadster | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4265 cc | 2801 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 256 HP | 192 HP |
Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 7400 RPM |
Torque | 365 Nm | 279 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 980 kg | 1588 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3850 mm | 4490 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1560 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1250 mm | 1370 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2290 mm | 2730 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 63 L |