1961 AC Cobra vs. 2004 Fiat Panda
To start off, 2004 Fiat Panda is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 AC Cobra. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 AC Cobra would be higher. At 4,265 cc (8 cylinders), 1961 AC Cobra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1961 AC Cobra (256 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 186 more horse power than 2004 Fiat Panda. (70 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1961 AC Cobra should accelerate faster than 2004 Fiat Panda.
Because 2004 Fiat Panda is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1961 AC Cobra. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Fiat Panda will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1961 AC Cobra (365 Nm @ 4800 RPM) has 220 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Fiat Panda. (145 Nm @ 1500 RPM). This means 1961 AC Cobra will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Fiat Panda.
Compare all specifications:
| 1961 AC Cobra | 2004 Fiat Panda | |
| Make | AC | Fiat |
| Model | Cobra | Panda |
| Year Released | 1961 | 2004 |
| Body Type | Roadster | Crossover |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4265 cc | 1251 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 256 HP | 70 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Torque | 365 Nm | 145 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4800 RPM | 1500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 3850 mm | 3580 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1560 mm | 1600 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1250 mm | 1630 mm |
