1961 AC Cobra vs. 2009 Holden UTE
To start off, 2009 Holden UTE is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 AC Cobra. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 AC Cobra would be higher. At 4,265 cc (8 cylinders), 1961 AC Cobra is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1961 AC Cobra (256 HP) has 14 more horse power than 2009 Holden UTE. (242 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1961 AC Cobra should accelerate faster than 2009 Holden UTE.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1961 AC Cobra (365 Nm) has 35 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Holden UTE. (330 Nm). This means 1961 AC Cobra will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Holden UTE.
Compare all specifications:
1961 AC Cobra | 2009 Holden UTE | |
Make | AC | Holden |
Model | Cobra | UTE |
Year Released | 1961 | 2009 |
Body Type | Roadster | Pickup |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4265 cc | 3600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 256 HP | 242 HP |
Torque | 365 Nm | 330 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |